首页> 外文OA文献 >EUROPEAN LAW IN THE EMPIRES OF MECHANICAL JURISPRUDENCE: THE JUDICIAL APPLICATION OF EUROPEAN LAW IN CENTRAL EUROPEAN CANDIDATE COUNTRIES
【2h】

EUROPEAN LAW IN THE EMPIRES OF MECHANICAL JURISPRUDENCE: THE JUDICIAL APPLICATION OF EUROPEAN LAW IN CENTRAL EUROPEAN CANDIDATE COUNTRIES

机译:机械法学中的欧洲法:欧洲法在中欧候选国中的司法适用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Summary: The process of European enlargement had a peculiar nature. Prior to accession in 2004, EU law was not yet formally binding on EU candidates’ domestic courts, while the obligation of gradual harmonisation with EU law rested upon them. Consequently, the application of EU law in future Member States presented particularly interesting problems and challenges, and required an understanding of the sophisticated concept of EU law’s persuasive force. The only rational choice was to apply Community law, taking into account not only the limited scope of the legislative texts for harmonisation, but also Community law in its full meaning. This included the texts of European directives, which had to be transposed into domestic law, as well as their reasoning and rationale, which would explain why a particular policy was regulated at the European level; ECJ jurisprudence; and, ideally, also the case law of EU Member States. This article argues that this involves a special type of use of comparative law.
机译:简介:欧洲扩张的进程具有独特的性质。在2004年加入欧盟之前,欧盟法律尚未对欧盟候选人的国内法院正式施加约束力,而逐步与欧盟法律保持统一的义务则由他们承担。因此,在未来的成员国中实施欧盟法律带来了特别有趣的问题和挑战,并且需要了解欧盟法律的说服力的复杂概念。唯一合理的选择是应用共同体法律,不仅要考虑到统一立法文本的有限范围,还要充分考虑共同体法律的含义。其中包括必须转换为国内法的欧洲指令的案文,以及它们的推理和理由,这可以解释为什么在欧洲一级对特定政策进行了监管;欧洲法院判例;最好是欧盟成员国的判例法。本文认为,这涉及比较法的一种特殊使用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kuhn, Zdenek;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号